Legal Opinion

Purinton v. Dyson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1937No. Sac. No. 5052PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

This action is in equity and was brought by respondent, who, it is conceded is a pretermitted heir of Adeline Potter, to recover her share of the estate of her ancestor which was distributed to Fred Fillmore Schaffer. Schaffer died before this action was brought and respondent named as defendants appellant Dyson, individually and as executor of Schaffer’s will, and Carrie Sims, as special administratrix of Schaffer’s estate. Respondent recovered judgment against the defendants named, and Dyson appealed.

Adeline Potter died testate in 1932, leaving as her only heirs Thomas G. Purinton, a son,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Zaremba v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Larrabee v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API