Legal Opinion

Zaremba v. Woods

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1936No. Civ. 5636PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

In this action the plaintiff obtained a judgment and decree to the effect that a certain agreement and will executed by Adolph Erich Zaremba were procured by undue, influence; that in the securing of the probate just referred to Walter Wayne Woods was guilty of extrinsic fraud. The decree further adjudged that all of the property in possession of the defendant, Walter Wayne Woods, was held in trust by him for the benefit of the heirs of said deceased, and of the persons entitled to receive the same upon distribution thereof. From this judgment and decree the defendants appeal.

The will and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Caldwell v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Nicholson v. LeathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Monk v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Purinton v. DysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API