Legal Opinion

Larrabee v. Tracy

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1943No. L. A. 18084PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

— The respondent, Edith Larrabee, alleging that an order of the probate court had been obtained by extrinsic fraud, brought this action in equity for relief. The order in question, made in the Estate of Mark H. Rice, decreed that a legacy to Kate Chase, mother of the respondent, had lapsed and that appellant Wellman as residuary legatee was entitled thereto.

The will of Mark H. Rice was admitted to probate September 1, 1931. By its terms one-sixth of decedent’s estate was given to his cousin Mary Tracy, one-sixth to his cousin Kate Chase, one-third to three charities, and the residue to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Purinton v. DysonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Zander v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Gale v. WittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Mills v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API