Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Hapke
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1960No. Civ. 24473PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tem. *
Appeal is taken from a judgment in an unlawful detainer action, filed pursuant to section 1161a, subdivision 4, Code of Civil Procedure, finding plaintiff is the owner and entitled to possession of certain real property located in the city of Ventura, California.
The evidence discloses that in August of 1958, C. Samuel Johnson, plaintiff herein, loaned defendant and her husband, Raymond Hapke, the sum of $10,000. This loan was evidenced by a promissory note payable in monthly installments. The note was secured by a deed of trust covering the real property which is the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Jenner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Ades v. BrushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Alford v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abrams v. MotterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Berk v. Twenty-Nine Palms Ranchos, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Page v. PageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Stiner v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Nakashima v. MuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970