Berk v. Twenty-Nine Palms Ranchos, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
Plaintiff-respondent, David N. M. Berk, an attorney at law, recovered a judgment against defendant-appellant Twentynine Palms Ranchos, Inc., a corporation, for $6,000, upon an account stated for legal work and services performed by him for defendant corporation.
In its answer, defendant denied the existence of any such indebtedness and, by way of counterclaim, sought to recover from plaintiff the sum of $4,000 paid by defendant to plaintiff. In addition, it sought to recover from plaintiff compensatory and punitive damages allegedly suffered by defendant by reason of alleged malperformanee by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Cole v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Battelle v. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Scadden Flat Gold Mining Co. v. ScaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Div. of Labor Law Enf't v. Transpacific Transp. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Ruth v. Lytton Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Santoro v. CarboneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Carlson, Collins, Gordon & Bold v. BanducciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Byrne v. Hauptman, O'Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.