Legal Opinion

Walton v. Mays

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1920PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, for Power County. lion. Robert M. Terrell, Judge. Action to recover balance on account. Judgment for plaintiff. The jury decides the question upon the'evidence, not upon the pleadings. It would be a vicious practice to require the pleadings to be sent out with the jury to their jury-room.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, for Power County. lion. Robert M. Terrell, Judge. Action to recover balance on account. Judgment for plaintiff. The jury decides the question upon the'evidence, not upon the pleadings. It would be a vicious practice to require the pleadings to be sent out with the jury to their jury-room. (Spaulding v. Saltiel, 18 Colo. 86, 31 Pac. 486.) It would not conduce to a full and fair trial if inexperienced jurors were left to determine the issues from the pleadings. (Kansas City, Ft. Scott, S. & M. B. B. Go. v. Eagan, 64 Kan. 421, 67…

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff upon an action to recover balance due upon account.

The first assignment is that the court erred in allowing the jury to take the complaint, answer and bill of particulars to the jury-room, and in instructing the jury that it might refer to them and each of them for such information as would assist it in arriving at a proper verdict.

C. S., sec. 6852, provides: “Upon retiring for deliberation the jury may take with them all papers which have been received as evidence in the cause, except depositions, or copies of such papers as ought not,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nance v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Powley v. SwensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Berlin Machine Works v. Dehlbom Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Landry v. Seattle Port Angeles & Western Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. McGuire v. Bryant Lumber & Shingle Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Shepard v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Ryan v. Beaver CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Continental Jewelry Co. v. IngelstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API