Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Smith

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1953No. 8013PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Plaintiff, appellant, brought this action to recover damages for the loss of one horse and injury to another resulting from a collision with an automobile owned and driven by the defendant, respondent, who cross-complained, seeking damages sustained to his car. The jury returned its verdict as follows:

“We, the jury, in the above entitled cause, find for the defendant both par1 ties are negligent and that negligence of each was a proximate causé of the accident. Neither party shall recover any damages.”

Judgment was accordingly entered allowing neither party any recovery, either…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hart v. Washington Park ClubIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Wells, Inc. v. ShoemakeNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Allan v. Oregon Short Line RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Anderson v. NixonUtah Supreme Court · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whitt v. JarnaginIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zenier v. Spokane International Railroad CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Olsen v. HawkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Davis v. BushnellIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  5. O'CONNOR v. BlackIdaho Supreme Court · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API