Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Beaver County

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1933No. 5125PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is an action at law. The case was tried to a jury. The action arose upon a contract between J. D. Ryan, plaintiff and appellant, and Beaver county, defendant and respondent. The contract is written. The county sought, in pursuance of Laws Utah 1927, chap. 69, and after declaring all abandoned horses within the county a public nuisance, and after'advertisement, bids for the elimination of such horses. Ryan being the lowest bidder, Beaver county awarded the contract to him. By the terms of the contract Ryan agreed to eliminate all abandoned horses running at large in a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Utah Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. CluffUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Shortino v. Salt Lake & U. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Farnsworth v. Union Pac. Coal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Drake v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shepard v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Dollarhide v. GunstreamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. DonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Williams v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Gribble v. CowleyUtah Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API