Legal Opinion

Nance v. Valentine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1918No. 13523PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered January 3, 1916, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Nance, as assignee of Nanee-Heiner Realty & Specialty Company, seeks recovery of what *324he alleges to be a commission agreed to be paid to that company by the defendant, Valentine, for effecting an exchange of his real property. Trial in the superior court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the defendant, made and rendered at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence on motion in that behalf then made by his counsel. From this disposition of the cause, the plaintiff has appealed to this court. The principal ground upon which the judgment is rested is that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muir v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Irwin v. HolbrookWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Corbitt v. HarringtonWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Gilman v. BruntonWashington Supreme Court · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. White v. Panama Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Farley v. FairWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Larue v. Farmers & Mechanics BankWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Croft v. Millard County Drainage Dist. No. 1Utah Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API