Legal Opinion

Powley v. Swensen

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1905No. L.A. No. 1230PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Action for damages resulting from the death of plaintiffs’ father, W. F. Powley, who, it is alleged, lost his life while in the employment of defendants through their fault. The cause was tried with a jury, and plaintiffs had the verdict, upon which the court entered judgment. Defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial, and bring the appeal here on bill of exceptions.

Defendants were contractors who had undertaken to construct a tunnel in the city of Los Angeles through a hill lying between Hill and Figueroa streets, being a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hellman v. McWilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Bluedorn v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Swanson v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. LeakTexas Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  4. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Carey v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1943

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API