Legal Opinion
Kroupa v. Sunrise Ford
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 20, 2000No. B104684PublishedCited by 6 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P.J.
Plaintiffs James and Melissa Kroupa (Kroupa) sued an automobile dealer, a lease broker and the ultimate lessor for fraud and violations of consumer protection laws in connection with Kroupa’s lease of a 1991 Ford pickup truck. Kroupa appeals from the judgment entered against them after a bench trial. The judgment included an award of $12,089.01 plus prejudgment interest on lessor’s cross-complaint for breach of the lease, and an award of attorneys’ fees and costs to all defendants totaling $415,969.88.
The appellate issues relate to the sufficiency of the trial court’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- McAdams v. McElroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. v. American Vanguard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- Staten v. HealeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Earp v. EarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lachapelle v. Toyota Motor Credit CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ford v. Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Ford v. Antwerpen MotorcarsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Ford v. Antwerpen Motorcars Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Meseonzhnik v. Dovzhenko CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.