Legal Opinion
Lachapelle v. Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 7, 2002No. A093355, A095611PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEIN, Acting P. J.
These consolidated appeals arise from a five-year lease of a Toyota 4-Runner (the Toyota) by plaintiff and appellant Katrina R. LaChapelle from FAA Concord T, Incorporated (the dealer). The lease agreement recites, among other things, that the “agreed-upon value” of the Toyota was $31,938, the gross capitalized cost would be $32,653 and the residual value at the end of the lease would be $15,524.18. Appellant agreed to pay $1,207.94 at the time of the lease signing or delivery and to make 60 additional monthly payments of $530.94. At the end of the lease term she was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. CenanceSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Gutierrez v. Autowest, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Jones v. Wachovia BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Dollinger Deanza Associates v. Chicago Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mackey v. Bd. of Trs. of the Cal. State Univ., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.