Staten v. Heale
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiffs Jack F. Staten and Jane Staten won a judgment in Nevada against Jack R. Armstrong. (For convenience, we refer to the Statens collectively as “plaintiff,” as did the trial court.) Thereafter plaintiff filed separate suits naming Armstrong, Leah Heale (Armstrong’s mother), and Elizabeth Part (Armstrong’s aunt), as defendants, alleging that Armstrong had fraudulently transferred real property in California to Heale and Part to avoid the enforcement of the Nevada judgment. The suits were consolidated for court trial.
After a six-day trial, the trial court issued a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FabianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Bird v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Khan v. Medical BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Gordon v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Safeco Surplus Lines Co. v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kroupa v. Sunrise FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- In re Marriage of Okhrimovskaya CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Marriage of Kirwan CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Meseonzhnik v. Dovzhenko CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020