Legal Opinion

Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. v. American Vanguard Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1988No. F008109PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETTITT, J. *

Code of Civil Procedure* 1 section 1021.6 permits a court, upon motion and after reviewing the evidence in the principal case, to award attorney’s fees to a person who prevails on a claim for implied indemnity. Before the court can make such an award, however, it must find that: (1) the indemnitee, in protection of its own interest, was required to bring or defend an action against a third party due to a tort of the indemnitor; (2) the indemnitor was properly notified of the demand to bring the action or to provide the defense and did not avail itself of the opportunity to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Prentice v. North American Title Guaranty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bay Development, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fidelity Mortgage Trustee Service, Inc. v. Ridgegate East Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. SetserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Kroupa v. Sunrise FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Watson v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API