Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Kane
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 26, 2019No. 5ag/18PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Eugene Ignatius Kane, Jr., Miscellaneous Docket AG No. 5, September Term, 2018 ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – INDEFINITE SUSPENSION Respondent Eugene Ignatius Kane, Jr., violated the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (“MLRPC”) 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.7, 1.16, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4, 8.1, and 8.4(a) and (d). These violations arose from Respondent’s misconduct during his representation of clients in two separate matters, as well as in his own personal bankruptcy filings and tax return filings. Taken together, Respondent’s violations warrant the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. FezellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. ParrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. KalarestaghiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Attorney Grievance v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.