Legal Opinion
Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. Mayberry
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 2006No. 48A02-0504-CV-368PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Bridgestone Americas Holding Inc., Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., Bridge-stone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC, and Bridgestone/Firestone Manufacturing Operations Division (collectively "Bridgestone") bring this interlocutory appeal to challenge the trial court's order compelling discovery of Bridgestone's highly proprietary skim stock formula 1 Bridgestone presents three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court abused its discretion when it ordered Bridgestone to disclose its skim stock formula.
We affirm.
FACTS…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Murray v. City of LawrenceburgIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc. v. MayberryIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- T-3 Martinsville, LLC v. U.S. Holding, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. FoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.