Murray v. City of Lawrenceburg
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
We hold that inverse condemnation is the sole remedy for a governmental act that purports to exercise all rights of ownership over a parcel of land. We also hold that the six year statute of limitations for trespass applies to such a claim. As a result, the statute of limitations bars the plaintiffs' suit in 2005 seeking to claim ownership of land leased in 1997 by the City of Lawrenceburg to a private party.
Facts and Procedural History
Because this is an appeal from the denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings, we accept the allegations of the complaint as true.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Noblesville Redevelopment Commmission v. Noblesville Associates Ltd. PartnershipIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Dible v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Schnull v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
- Woodruff v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC v. National Trust Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
- KS&E Sports and Edward J. Ellis v. Dwayne H. RunnelsIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- Tina Gerlach v. Todd RokitaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.