T-3 Martinsville, LLC v. U.S. Holding, LLC
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
T-3 Martinsville, LLC, and MS Mar-tinsville, LLC ("Landlords"), bring this interlocutory appeal of the rulings against them in the trial court's "Ruling on Motions for Summary Judgment." US Holding, LLC ("USH"), John W. Bartle, and Hoosier Enterprises IX, Inc. ("Hoosier") (sometimes collectively referred to as "Ap-pellees"), cross-appeal the rulings against them in the aforementioned order. We affirm. 1
Issues
Landlords raise one issue, which we restate as follows:
I. Whether Landlords were required to provide USH with notice and an opportunity to cure its default…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Catt v. Board of Com'rs of Knox CountyIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Brown v. BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Indianapolis v. Twin Lakes Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kartman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Town of New Chicago v. City of Lake Station Ex Rel. Lake Station Sanitary DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Price v. KuchaesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Floyd County and Floyd County Plan Commission v. City of New Albany and New Albany City Plan CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Block v. MaguraIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.