Packard v. Smart
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
Tbe demurrer admits tbe material facts alleged in tbe complaint. Hence, it becomes necessary for us to determine whether or not tbe construction of tbe building as described in tbe complaint, pursuant to a parol agreement created reciprocal or cross easements as to each owner, in tbe hallways of tbe building. If so, are tbe defendants, tbe present owners of tbe Foster property, bound by said easements %
In tbe case of Reid v. King, 158 N. C., 85, 73 S. E., 168, tbe plaintiff bad constructed a party wall pursuant to a parol agreement with one Thompson, tbe owner of an adjoining lot. It was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pitt v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Pierce v. Cleland, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1890
- Richardson v. TobeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Tucker v. . MarklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Forde v. LibbyWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Spruill v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Chew v. . LeonardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Waters v. North Carolina Phosphate Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.