Legal Opinion

Spruill v. Nixon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1953No. 93PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

Two questions, determinative of tbis appeal, are bere presented for consideration and decision. 1. Was an easement in tbe road across tbe land, now owned by defendant, created by implication of law, upon tbe severance of unity of title by tbe common grantor, Axie Lane, as set forth in tbe facts found by tbe trial court ? 2. If so, was sucb easement extinguished by tbe judgment in tbe civil action instituted by T. E. Ainsley, immediate predecessor in title of present plaintiff, against Cecil Nixon, tbe present defendant?

In the light of applicable principles of law, applied to the facts found…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Edmundson v. EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Carmon v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Edmundson v. . EdmundsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. In Re Will of PendergrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Smith v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Environmental Management Commission v. House of Raeford Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API