Legal Opinion

Waters v. North Carolina Phosphate Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 182PA83PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

At the outset, we note that care must be taken to distinguish the doctrine of apparent and visible easements from the rule of conveyances of real property containing physical burdens upon the land, permanent in character and known to the vendee.

The doctrine of apparent and visible easements is a method used to create easements. Easements can be created in at least nine ways, including the use of the doctrine of apparent and visible easements. Davis v. Robinson, 189 N.C. 589, 127 S.E. 697 (1925); 1 Mordecai Law Lectures 464 (1916). The application of the doctrine is fully…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Shingleton v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Hensley v. RamseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Borders v. YarbroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Century Communications, Inc. v. Housing Authority of Wilson & Site, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Brown v. Weaver-Rogers Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Pearce v. American Defender Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Swan Quarter Farms, Inc. v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API