Legal Opinion

State v. Teasley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1976No. 7612SC539PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

After court was convened on the morning of the second day of this case, the trial was delayed to enable defense counsel to interview a witness. During the pause, the court directed the district attorney to call another case for disposition by plea. The jury remained in the jury box but was instructed by the trial judge that the case being heard on the plea of guilty was completely unrelated to the charges against defendant. The district attorney then called State v. Roosevelt McPherson, a case which, although factually unrelated to the case sub judice, also involved a defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. McEachernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GuffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. HardinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API