Legal Opinion

State v. Whitted

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1978No. 7814SC488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

By his single assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial judge committed prejudicial and reversible error in his instructions to the jury by stating the defendant’s contentions upon assumed facts not in evidence and, thereby, expressed an opinion in violation of G.S. 1-180. This assignment of error is meritorious.

At the outset we note that G.S. 1-180 was repealed effective 1 July 1978. The enactment of G.S. 15A-1232, effective concurrently with the repeal of G.S. 1-180, restated and brought forward the substance of the former statute. See also G.S. 15A-1222. By…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. BlueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. TeasleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. HewittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GuffeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. McKoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. SidburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. HerrinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API