Legal Opinion

State v. McEachern

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1973No. 45PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that the trial judge violated the provisions of G.S. 1-180 by expressing an opinion as to his guilt.

During the prosecuting witness’s direct testimony the trial judge asked the following question: “Court: Let me ask you a question of clarification before you go any further, you were in the car when you were raped? A. Yes, sir.”

This question was posed after Mrs. Sanderson had testified she had been rendered unconscious by defendant’s blow, and after she stated she “saw this black man’s body and my bloody pants going out the window.”

On occasion, it is the duty…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. BlackstockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API