Legal Opinion

State v. Canipe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1954No. 291PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.

Every person charged with crime has an absolute right to a fair trial. By this it is meant that he is entitled to a trial before an impartial judge and an unprejudiced jury in an atmosphere of judicial calm. S. v. Carter, 233 N.C. 581, 65 S.E. 2d 9.

We are confronted at the threshold of this appeal by the assignments of error which assert, in essence, that the able and just presiding judge unintentionally impaired the fundamental right of the prisoner to have his cause determined by an unprejudiced jury in an atmosphere of judicial calm by the questions he put during the selection of the jury…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. MountSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  4. State v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API