Legal Opinion

DeYoung v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2001No. CA A106889; SC S47467; CA A105130; SC S47322PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

These two petitions, consolidated for briefing, argument, and opinion, seek review of dismissals by the Court of Appeals of petitions for judicial review of orders issued by the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (Board). The petitions challenge the dismissal orders of the Court of Appeals only to the extent that they designate the Board as the prevailing party on appeal and allow costs — specifically, a $100 prevailing party fee — payable by petitioners. Petitioners argue that, under the circumstances, the Court of Appeals had no authority to designate a prevailing party or to award…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brown v. Multnomah County District CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. EstesOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Quintero v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Meyer v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blacknall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. StraughanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Brennan v. La Tourelle ApartmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  4. Blacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. Shearer's Foods v. Hoffnagle (In re Hoffnagle)Oregon Supreme Court · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API