Legal Opinion

Shearer's Foods v. Hoffnagle (In re Hoffnagle)

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 2018No. SC S065049PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

**148We previously denied employer's petition for review in this workers' compensation case, Shearer's Foods v. Hoffnagle , 284 Or.App. 859, 395 P.3d 622, rev. den. , 361 Or. 866, --- P.3d ---- (2017), and now address claimant's petition for an award of attorney fees for time that his counsel spent in response to employer's unsuccessful petition for review. Claimant did not file a response to the petition for review but now seeks an award of fees under ORS 656.386(1)(a) for time spent considering whether or not to file a response to employer's petition for review. Claimant also seeks attorney…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Department of Consumer & Business Services v. MuliroOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. 1000 Friends of Ore. v. Bd. of Cty. Com'rs, Etc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Strawn v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arvidson v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In re LongOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Peabody v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Taylor v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. Peabody v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API