Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. SELNES

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1960PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is an action for malicious prosecution. After the plaintiff rested his case, the court sustained the motions of defendants Arnold Seines, Jens Svinth, and Gr. Carroll Meeks for judgment of involuntary nonsuit. The court also sustained the motion of defendant The United States National Bank of Portland for a directed verdict in its favor after the latter had rested its case without presenting evidence. Prom a judgment based on said rulings, the plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff, Jack A. Shoemaker, was the president and principal stockholder of Washington Creamery Co., a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. RossOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Watts v. GerkingOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hryciuk v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Retail Credit Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Miller v. Columbia CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Rogers v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API