Energetics, Ltd v. Whitmill
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
These consolidated appeals require us to decide whether certain severed oil and gas interests in a tract of land were properly "deemed abandoned” in favor of the surface owners by operation of the dormant minerals act. Because, as we construe the act, 2 the interests in question were not abandoned, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
I
The relevant facts bearing upon the principal issue in these appeals are not in dispute. 3 Elmer Benchley and his wife, Virginia, own the surface and an undisputed 35/80 interest in the oil and gas rights in an eighty-acre parcel of land in Clare…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
- Jupiter Oil Co. v. SnowTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
- Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MorenoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Koenig v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.