Legal Opinion

Energetics, Ltd v. Whitmill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1993No. Docket Nos. 91653, 91656, (Calendar No. 10)PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

These consolidated appeals require us to decide whether certain severed oil and gas interests in a tract of land were properly "deemed abandoned” in favor of the surface owners by operation of the dormant minerals act. Because, as we construe the act, 2 the interests in question were not abandoned, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

I

The relevant facts bearing upon the principal issue in these appeals are not in dispute. 3 Elmer Benchley and his wife, Virginia, own the surface and an undisputed 35/80 interest in the oil and gas rights in an eighty-acre parcel of land in Clare…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Texaco, Inc. v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jupiter Oil Co. v. SnowTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McCullough Oil, Inc. v. RezekWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nation v. W D E Electric Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MorenoMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Koenig v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Buell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Mable Cleary Trust v. Edward-Marlah Muzyl TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API