Takekawa v. Hole
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Anderson & Anderson, and WatMns & Blodgett, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This cause was tried in the superior court of Orange County and in November, 1909, a judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the recovery of certain real property. Findings of fact and conclusions of law and the judgment were all signed by the judge who tried the case, and the judgment was duly entered by the clerk in his judgment docket. The complaint averred the plaintiff’s right of recovery of sixty shares of stock of the La Habra Water Company. It alleged an unwarranted refusal of the defendant to execute and deliver to the plaintiff a deed of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Brien v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- First National Bank v. DusyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Homeseekers Loan Association v. GleesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by22 opinions
- Stevens Expert Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Prothero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Davis v. RudolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.