First National Bank v. Dusy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Fresno and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion,
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Action to foreclose a mortgage and a pledge of water stock. Findings and decree passed in favor of the plaintiff, and Busy, the debtor and mortgagor, appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The demand sought to be fore^ closed was a promissory note for $1,900, made by Busy to the plaintiff Becember 28, 1889, payable on demand. Said note also provided that in case of suit a reasonable attorney’s fee should be allowed by the court. As security for the payment of this note, Busy assigned to the bank sixteen and one-half shares of the capital stock of. the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Broder v. ConklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Sichel v. De CarrilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Lankton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.