Davis v. Rudolph
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBrat, J.
This appeal arises out of a rather unusual situation. The facts are not disputed. In 1939, a judgment was recovered in the sum of $2,721.25 in favor of plaintiff Frank Davis and against Violet Rudolph'and John Bell. Joseph A. Brown was plaintiff’s attorney of record in that litigation. The judgment being unpaid, Attorney Brown on July 18, 1944, filed suit on behalf of plaintiff to renew that judgment. On March 1, 1946, plaintiff Davis signed an assignment to “B. H. Freeman and or Freeman Adjustment Bureau” (hereinafter referred to merely as “Freeman”) of his interest in the ‘1 cause now…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Estate of GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Casey v. Overhead Door Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- In Re SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hendricks v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Stark v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Berman v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.