Legal Opinion

Prothero v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1925No. Docket No. L.A. 8502PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioner commenced an action in the respondent court against John F. Boose and others to quiet his title to certain real property and for injunctive relief. The defendants filed an answer wherein affimative relief was sought. At the conclusion of the trial on October 15, 1924, the court made an order from the bench denying relief to both parties and caused an entry thereof to be made in the minutes as follows: “Argument opened and closed. Judgment of the court that both sides take nothing.” No findings of fact, conclusions of law, or judgment were made or entered pursuant to said order…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Decou v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Brownell v. Superior Court of Yolo Cty.California Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wadleigh v. PhelpsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Lámar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API