Legal Opinion
Stute v. Burinda
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided July 27, 1981No. Civ. A. No. 14863PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FAINER, P. J.
Plaintiff, as a representative of the Construction Teamsters Health and Welfare Trust, sued defendants Burinda, an individual, Tassel, an individual, Gus J. Burinda Inc., a corporation, and Burinda and Tassel as partners doing business as Bur Van Builders, in the Municipal Court for the Los Angeles Judicial District. These defendants are collectively called “defendants” in this opinion. Plaintiff also sued Zenith National Insurance. Zenith National Insurance answered the complaint. The defendants moved for a change of venue contending that the moving defendants were all…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Wrin v. OhlandtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tradecomet. Com LLC v. Google, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Mitchell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986