Legal Opinion

Wrin v. Ohlandt

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 13483PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a-change of venue from the county of Napa to the city and county of San Francisco upon the ground of the convenience of witnesses. Substantially the only issue in said action pending in the Superior Court of the County of Napa involved the reasonable value of certain medical services rendered defendant’s intestate by two physicians, the assignors of the claims sued on. In plaintiff’s affidavit in .support of her motion for a change of venue to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco she set forth the names of these two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Security Investment Co. v. GiffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Blossom v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Peiser v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Willingham v. PecoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Wood v. SilversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Rice v. SchubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Harden v. Skinner & HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API