Armstrong v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
JONES (B. C.), J. pro tem.
In this case the appeal is from an order denying a motion for a change of venue to the county of the defendant’s residence.
On the 5th of January, 1938, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to construct a multiple dwelling house for the defendant on a lot in the city of Oakland, county of Alameda. The contract, in a form usually employed by builders, was prepared and executed by the parties in San Francisco. At the time the action was brought the defendant resided in the county of San Mateo. There are no express…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seaboard Acceptance Corp. v. ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Application of Monrovia Evening PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Ex Parte GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Jackson v. CreekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kuchel v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Dawson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.