Legal Opinion

Pinski v. Adelman

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 12, 1996No. 94 C 5783PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MORAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to file a “Second Amendment to the Amended Complaint,” asserting vicarious liability by various insurance companies under the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act on the basis of the apparent or actual authority of defendant Adelman as their agent. The proposed amendments do explicitly so allege, and if this were the initial pleading we would hesitate to dismiss it. This pleading is, however, an amendment arising in the context of this court’s prior rulings and we believe that we can and should deny the motion to amend if it is apparent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Security Insurance v. BurgosIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ladonna Anderson as of the Estate of Donald Anderson v. Marathon Petroleum Company, F/k/a Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Zannini v. Reliance Insurance of Illinois, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Lang v. Consumers Insurance Service, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Deborah J. Anetsberger, Margaret H. Lepine and Joseph A. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Burnham Mortgage, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Crichton v. Golden Rule InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Williams v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
  4. Crichton v. Golden Rule Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API