Legal Opinion

Crichton v. Golden Rule Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 13, 2005No. 5-03-0637PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hopkins

The plaintiff, John H. Crichton, Jr., on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, appeals the circuit court’s order entering a summary judgment in favor of defendant Federation of American Consumers and Travelers (FACT) on the plaintiffs Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 2002)) and breach of fiduciary duty claims. On appeal, the plaintiff also argues that the circuit court erred in refusing to permit him to acquire from FACT additional discovery pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 191(b) (145 Ill. 2d R. 191(b)). Defendant…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Ltd.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Crichton v. Golden Rule InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Kensington's Wine Auctioneers & Brokers, Inc. v. John Hart Fine Wine, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  3. Tully v. McLeanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  4. Willett v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Rockford Memorial Hospital v. HavrileskoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API