Legal Opinion
Kelly v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2003No. C0-02-217PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
This appeal arises out of cross-motions for partial summary judgment regarding appellant Marcia Kelly’s ability to obtain underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits from respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). As the relevant facts are undisputed, the sole issue before us is whether the exclusion in State Farm’s policy, which would preclude Kelly’s claim for UIM benefits, contravenes Minnesota case law and the language of the Minnesota No-Fault Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2002).
On September 19, 1998, Kelly’s husband was driving his Dodge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Myers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Petrich Ex Rel. Lee v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Meyer v. Illinois Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Latterell v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Economy Premier Assurance Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Schwickert, Inc. v. Winnebago Seniors, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Sayer v. Minnesota Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Pepper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.