Legal Opinion
Hiatt v. San Francisco National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1966No. 20465PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
361 F.2d 504
Barbara L. HIATT, Appellant,
v.
SAN FRANCISCO NATIONAL BANK, Doe One, Doe Two, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver of San Francisco National Bank, Appellees.
No. 20465.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
April 29, 1966.
Edmond C. Ward, Pendergrass, McKenney, Perry & Ward, San Rafael, Cal., for appellant.
Roy A. Bronson, Alan I. Kaplan, Harold R. McKinnon, Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon, San Francisco. Cal., for appellees.
Robert D. Raven, Melvin R. Goldman, Morrison, Foerster, Holloway, Clinton & Clark, San Francisco, Cal., for amicus curiae, California Bankers…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Daggs v. Phœnix National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hiatt v. San Francisco National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smiley v. CitibankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tully v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2005
- Giannangeli v. Target National Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013