Giannangeli v. Target National Bank, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
CARLOS F. LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Marie Giannangeli filed a putative class action complaint against Target National Bank (“Target”), 1 alleging that Target committed usury by charging more than the seven percent maximum interest rate found in the National Banking Act (“NBA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 85 & 86. The distinct court granted Target’s motion to dismiss. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm.
I
Giannangeli’s complaint sets forth a simple factual premise. She obtained a Target “REDcard” credit card in 2009 and received a copy of the credit card…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich, L.P.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moore v. MB Financial Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Danny Lee Warner Jr. v. Demetric Godfrey, et al.District Court, D. Montana · 2026