Legal Opinion
Hiatt v. San Francisco National Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1966No. 20465PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from the District Court's dismissal of her complaint. The action was based upon the claim that usurious interest had been charged and collected by the appellee, San Francisco National Bank, a national banking association.1 It was begun in the California state court and removed to the District Court, where jurisdiction was grounded upon the provisions of sections 1346 and 1348 of Title 28, U.S.C. and section 1819 of Title 12, U.S.C.
The appellant borrowed a sum of money from the appellee and, by agreement, paid a rate of interest amounting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tiffany v. National Bank of Mo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Daggs v. Phœnix National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
3Cited by9 opinions
- Northway Lanes v. Hackley Union National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Biby v. Union National Bank of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Fourchon, Inc. v. Louisiana National Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Hiatt v. San Francisco National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.