Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fryberg v. Maybury

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1925No. 19366. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Askren, J. —

This is an application for a writ of mandate to require the director of licenses of the state of Washington to surrender a license to practice drug-less healing in the state of Washington, which was issued to relator by the director of licenses on August 15, 1919, and returned to the director in November, 1922. The facts essential to the determination of this controversy are as follows: On August 15, 1919, relator had issued to him what will he hereafter referred to as a limited license to practice drugless healing. Sometime thereafter the drugless examining commit tee, which,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. State v. SchultzMontana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HazzardWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Butcher v. MayburyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1925
  4. Nguyen v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API