Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nguyen v. Department of Health

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2001No. 68994-6Published

1DissentIreland, J.

(dissenting) — We are asked in this case to decide if the Medical Quality Assurance Commission (Commission) denied due process to a physician subject to discipline when it employed a preponderance of the evi*535dence standard as the burden of proof for factual determinations. Contrary to the majority, we submit the preponderance standard adopted by the Department of Health (Department) by regulation for all health care professionals subject to the Uniform Disciplinary Act, chapter 18.130 RCW, does not violate principles of due process or equal protection. We would affirm the Commission’s findings…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API