Legal Opinion
Butcher v. Maybury
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided September 19, 1925No. 253PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCAMANT, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The statute sought to be restrained has been before the Supreme Court of Washington for construction. State ox rel. Fryberg v. Maybury (Wash.) 236 P. 566. It is there held that on the revocation of a full license, granted under substantially the conditions set forth in the bill in this ease, it is the duty of the director of licenses to return the limited license surrendered when the full license was granted. The court holds that “the right to practice is a valuable property right,” and that “this right was one that could only be taken away * * • * by…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Moity v. Louisiana State Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1976
- In Re Revocation of License of BermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Roberts v. State Board of Embalmers & Funeral DirectorsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.