Legal Opinion
State v. Hazzard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 12, 1926No. 19955. Department OnePublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAskren, J.
This matter was submitted to the trial court upon stipulation and, from an adverse decision, the defendant appeals.
The material facts stipulated are: The defendant Hazzard, in 1912, was the holder of a license issued by the state of Washington authorizing her to practice the art of healing. In that year, she was convicted of manslaughter, and sentenced to the penitentiary. Upon the strength of the record of conviction, the state medical hoard revoked her license. She was later pardoned by the governor. The material portion of the pardon, necessary to he observed in this inquiry, is as follows:
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hewitt v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In the Matter of ____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Roberts v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Prichard v. BattleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
- People v. BiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.