Legal Opinion
Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 23, 2001No. 68994-6PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 P.3d 689 (2001)
144 Wash.2d 516
Bang D. NGUYEN, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT of HEALTH MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 68994-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued November 16, 2000.
Decided August 23, 2001.
Ralph A. Alfieri, Seattle, for Petitioner.
David Hankins, Assistant Attorney General's Office, Olympia, for Respondent.
SANDERS, J.
The issue here is whether the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution requires proof by clear and convincing evidence in a medical disciplinary proceeding. We hold due process requires no less, reverse and…
2Cases cited122 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Granek v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.