Baker v. Brickell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The plaintiff brought this action to establish a trust in certain lands in the city and county of San Francisco against the defendant Brickell. Maria Baker Batchelder, the mother of plaintiff, was made a party defendant, but failed to appear, and her default was duly entered. The case was tried, and judgment given and entered in favor of the plaintiff. From that judgment, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, Brickell appealed to this court, where the judgment and order were reversed and the cause remanded. (Baker v. Brickell, 87 Cal. 329.) When the case went back to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of the Estate Op Bernard NewManCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re the Estate of CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Baker v. BrickellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Casement v. RinggoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Batchelder v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hamblin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Cook v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Employees Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- United Railroads of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.