Baker v. Brickell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
In this case there are two appeals presented by defendant Brickell. The first, 12992, from the judgment on the judgment roll, and the second, 13574, from the order denying Briclcell’s motion for a new trial. They are to be considered together.
The action is brought to establish a trust against defendant Brickell. The lands in controversy are portions of what is known as outside lands of the city and county of San .Francisco, and not within that portion affected by the Van Ness ordinance. John' H. Baker went into possession of the land in suit, called Baker tract, or Golden Gate ranch, on July…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Townsend v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Trenouth v. San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- McManus v. O'SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Palmer v. LowSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
- Hoppin v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In re the Estate of BeltWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Carruthers v. WhitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.