Batchelder v. Baker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court*
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action to quiet title to real estate. The defendant answered by a guardian ad litem, as shown by the recitals in such answer, denying the allegations of the complaint, but set up no claim or title to the property. There was judgment for the plaintiff, quieting her title, decreeing that she was the owner of the property, and that the defendant had no interest therein. The appeal is from the judgment, and is presented to us on the judgment roll.
It is contended by the appellant, —1. That no guardian ad litem was appointed by the court for the defendant, who was a minor; 2. That the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Harper v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Sharp v. DaugneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Neilson v. WalkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Baker v. BrickellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Griffin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Whelan v. BrickellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893